Since the establishment of the Zionist regime in 1948, it has faced persistent security concerns arising from demographic limitations, highly volatile borders, scarce natural resources, the lack of strategic geographic depth, and encirclement by numerous political and ideological adversaries. Consequently, from its inception to the present, this regime has consistently placed particular emphasis on the formulation of security–military doctrines to confront its enemies. In this context, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Axis of Resistance have been regarded as the most serious and significant existential threats to the Zionist regime. Accordingly, its leadership has designed, developed, and operationalized a range of security–military doctrines—such as the New Periphery Alliance, the Eisenkot (Dahiya) Doctrine, Gideon, the Campaign Between Wars (MABAM), Strategic Momentum (Momentum), the Offensive-Oriented Tenufa Doctrine, Action Fragmentation, and the Octopus Doctrine—with the aim of weakening and containing this perceived threat.
Using a descriptive–analytical approach, this study seeks to identify these doctrines and examine their modes of implementation against the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Axis of Resistance, drawing on library-based sources, texts, and domestic and international websites. The findings indicate that the Zionist regime advances its actions against Iran and the Axis of Resistance within the framework of these doctrines and, in doing so, employs any available tools and methods—even those falling within the realm of so-called dirty warfare.