The boarding party operation is one of the main missions for marines commando forces, during which the commander of the operating unit, without exception, is faced with the time limit in making a decision from the moment mission is announced; So the aim of the current applied research is to facilitate the decision making process by predicting possible solutions to choose the best strategies, in the standard form of game theory. This research scenario, is considered as a discrete static game, with competitive (non-cooperative) feature and incomplete information, and during it, the military units of two countries that dispute over the merchant target carrying the flag of a third country, as two players without knowing about the decisions of competitors, they allocate strategies. This article has attempted to intelligently examine and analyze the consequences of possible strategies, along with presenting the most preferred strategy, by using the laws of Nash equilibrium. By comparing the strategies of two military units with dispute on target , it is concluded that adopting a military confrontation strategy, regardless of the reaction of the unit, seems to most stable strategy of the conflicting parties. Generalization of the standard form of this game in the strategic environment of the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Sea of Oman, combined with experiences such as: the seizing the offending floating units by the I.R.I.N and I.R.G.C marines commando unit; It clearly proves the effectiveness of game theory in this operations.